By N. P. Upadhyaya Nepali
Kathmandu: Frankly speaking, the future course
of South Asian politics took a different dimension when the Indian Naxals met
at a KAROL BAGH Hotel in April, 2012. Analysts hope that this meet will shake
the entire South Asian countries sooner than later.
As mentioned in our previous issues, Nepali
Maoists, the radical ones, also reportedly took part in this meet and analysts
presume that the Maoists operating in other countries of South Asia must have
participated in the said Delhi Hotel meet.
Needless to say, the RIM or say the
Revolutionary Communist party of America led by Chairman Bob Avakian must have
vowed their unequivocal support to any such steps taken by this meet which went
in the favour of the teeming millions living in this part of the world reeling
under the yoke of, what they may have resolved, the Imperialists and the
declared expansionist. Chairman Dahal hates Avakian and the American Communist
party for some understandable reasons.
Of late Avakian too is being grilled by his own
comrade for the presentation of his new theory on “synthesis”.
The Karol Bagh meet is sure to go against
Dahal-Bhattarai signed treaty with India in June, 2002 and obviously the 12
point imposed Treaty, 2005.
Thus the fresh split of the Mohan Baidya panel
from the mother party must have been a well designed and a pre planned affair.
Look at the timing of the Hotel meet and the split in Nepal.
The Nepal Maoists cut is more than meets the
eye. It should be like that.
What is more than bamboozling is that the Nepal
President was quick enough to recognise this party, read Mohan Baidya’s, by
inviting the entire top hats of the freshly split party for a lavish luncheon. Mind
it that the Party has yet not been registered at the Nepal Election Commission
yet the luncheon.
But why? Has Pranav Mukherjee made yet another
call to our most Honourable President?
Honourable Dr. Yadav must have done so, as he
does quite often as he did on May 3, 2009, under, hopefully, the influence of
some alien quarters so that Mohan Baidya too meets with the same fate
ultimately as Dahal-Bhattarai duos have had in the recent past. NOIDA safe
landing? One more possible Indian tool in the end. ( Read the editorial
also-telephonic coercion exposed).
By extension, the NOIDA veterans must have
already entered into the Mohan Baidya scheme of things which will definitely
take a new height upon Mohan Baidya’s return from Beijing. Baidya by the way is
currently in Mao’s land and reportedly has met with high ranking Chinese
Communist party officials. Many infiltrators will be forced to enter into this
party in order to make the new political entity weak. Intelligence agents may
have been under “selection”.
The likelihood remains and this is what the
matured analysts opine.
A puzzled Beijing is definitely in the search
of a true and reliable friend in Nepal, however, though the search continues
yet the job has not been accomplished. The reasons are simple and obvious which
Beijing understands better but pretends.
Perhaps in the process of searching a trusted
friend who could understand China’s inner pains in Nepal, Mohan Baidya is in
Beijing now apparently which means that in the eyes of the Beijing authorities,
Mohan Baidya and his team were comparatively a “nationalist force” in Nepal
upon whom she can rely upon at least for some time until the new party gets
swelled by infiltrators from the known corners.
At yet another plane, the country’s politics
appears to have been awaiting a miraculous turn.
Leaving the entire country in a puzzle, the
sidelined King Gyanendra left for a European Tour, (France UK and Germany).
Must have been a well calculated diplomatic overture.
One must admit that his July 8, 2012, TV
interview has bewildered many a brains in Nepal, including those Nepali leaders
who have constructed a syndicate and ruling the nation with the awarded 12
point roadmap. The second episode of this interview is already in the pipeline.
But why all of a sudden the former Nepal
Monarch left for Europe? Has he some lobbies in that part of the world which
has a grand say in today’s Nepali politics? Is he expecting a definite role
from the Europeans and with this objective has embarked for seeking their
meaningful intervention for the restoration of what Nepal lost over these 12
point years? If it is so then which force on earth is speaking on his behalf?
Unconfirmed reports, but yet hopefully close to
the fact, have it that Nepal’s former Monarch is scheduled to meet some high
ranking French government authorities wherein he is supposed to speak his inner
feelings giving adequate space to the current political instability arising out
of the calculated death of the Constituent Assembly body.
Surprising as it may appear but yet the fact is
that, as the strong rumours reveal, Nepal’s former Monarch will receive the
kind cooperation of Rakesh Sood, the former Indian Ambassador to Nepal who is
now occupying the same post in France.
This equation sounds though funny in itself and
many people will prefer to reject it out rightly, however, analysts here would
wish to remind our readers that Rakesh Sood, the then Indian Ambassador to
Nepal had approached ex-Nepal King in a secret manner, 9 December, 2009, and
had sought the King’s support in lessening the Chinese increasing influence in
Nepal.
To go more deep into the story, the fact is
that Chinese Foreign Minister, Yang Jiechi, had told a Nepali gathering,
December 3, 2009, right inside the Chinese embassy hall in Kathmandu that “Any
threat to Nepal from any corner will be not tolerated by China”.
Apparently, Ambassador Sood was instructed by
his Delhi maters to be in contact with King Gyanendra and seek his personal
clout in lessening the swelling Chinese influence in Nepal. The meet took place
in Hotel Soaltee and lasted for almost two hours. Both had preferred the sun
set time.
However, the sidelined king said to Ambassador
Sood, (sic), “Don’t drag me into politics...You know I am not in a position to
influence the Nepali politics as it stands today”.
Thus the two and a half hours long meet at the
Soaltee Hotel ended inconclusive yet the relations remained.
Apart from Ambassador Sood, Nepal’s former
Monarch may solicit the support of late Francois Mitterrand lobby which loves
Nepal and Nepali Monarchy and is perhaps supporting Himani Trust.
Late Francois Mitterrand, the President of
France, and late King Birendra have had very close relations. The Nepali
Diaspora’s living in France help will be an added advantage for the sidelined
King, if at all they wish to support him.
They will for sure.
With the Chinese clout in world politics
definitely increasing, India may have felt comfortable in approaching once
again to King Gyanendra through its envoy in Paris and through him to convince
the French authorities on his importance in keeping Nepal a politically stable
country.
By the way, Chairman Jhal Nath Khanal too has
already left for Europe. Interesting trips.High placed sources claim
that Mr. Khanal will definitely meet the former Nepal King in one of the
European nations.
Mind it that the former Monarch has while
talking to the TV interview, July 8, 2012, had hinted that “Nepal must also
have a close look at its geographical location” which perhaps went ignored by
the most intelligent analysts of Kathmandu.
When he talks of “Geography”, he is definitely talking of his desire and confidence
that only his presence in Nepali politics can save India and China from going
to a fresh War.
The Indian authorities apparently were quick
enough to understand his message as regards to the use of the word GEOGRAPHY.
The Chinese apparently during Mr. Ai Ping trip
to Nepal have provided their positive nod to Nepal’s former Monarch. Rest,
expectedly, Mohan Baidya will convince about the raison d’être of the
institution of Nepali monarchy for thr stability of the South Asian
region.
The sidelined King believes that if he gets a
positive nod from Paris then London and Bonn will follow suit that may favour
him.
Well this could just be a mere sensing of the
pulse beat of the nations of the European Countries. The Europeans will take
some time to believe his version of Nepali politics.
The fact is that it will be and should be the
people of Nepal who will chart his fate. The sidelined King must not forget
this fact, (Read already posted five questions with analyst Keshav Bhattarai).
Thus the Karol Bagh Hotel meet and the fresh
trip of Mohan Baidya to Beijing and the visit of former Nepal King to Europe
must have some links. If anyone interested and pretty intelligent then he or
she can arrive at a definite conclusion establishing the links as mentioned
above.
But will Beijing feel comfortable if the Nepali
monarch, former one, establishes a friendly link with the European nation?
Courtesy: Telegraphnepal.com
No comments:
Post a Comment