Pioneer Editorial
No Government, no Constitution, no Republic
As time ran out on Sunday for Nepal’s Constituent Assembly to
produce a Constitution, leading to the body to be dissolved without having
finished its task, the country slipped into a period of both political and
legal uncertainty. For one, with the dismantling of the Constituent Assembly
which also served as Nepal’s
interim Parliament, the validity of Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai’s
Government has come under a cloud. The UCPN (Maoist) leader has said that he
will continue to lead the caretaker Government until a new Assembly is formed
after election on November 22. But his proposal has found few takers, with
leaders from the other two major parties — the CPN-UML and the Nepali Congress
— strongly opposed to the idea of another poll. The is because all Nepali
politicians, irrespective of their ideological commitment, are hugely unpopular
in the country in these times. Consumed by their own political ambitions, they
have spent the last six years bickering with one another instead of guiding Nepal towards
peace and democracy. So much so that the Constituent Assembly’s initial
two-year mandate had to be extended four times in as many years, until finally,
Nepal’s
Supreme Court ruled last November that there would no more extensions at the
end of the current term, which expired on May 28. It is in accordance with this
judgement that Mr Bhattarai dismantled the Constituent Assembly and decided to
go back to the people for a fresh mandate. But if elections are indeed held
anytime soon, it is highly unlikely that many of these leaders will find their
way back to Kathmandu. This explains why the
leaders have now approached President Ram Baran Yadav to set aside the election
date. They of course argue that the decision was taken in a “unilateral” and
“authoritarian” fashion by Mr Bhattarai without factoring in their opinion.
Even if this was the case, the dispute is still the result of a fractured body
politik.
More importantly, even if an election is held
sometime soon, it will essentially be a referendum on the politically divisive
issue of federalism. It is over this point of contention that the Constituent
Assembly had failed to build consensus. The shape and form of Nepal’s federal
structure has been a thorny issue involving both individual political
aspirations for the future as well as historical tensions between communities
going back centuries. It is a key issue that must be carefully resolved in
keeping with aspirations of the various communities, but it must also be done
before popular unrest boils down to violence. For that the country’s political
elite must come together and literally draw the roadmap for the future. But
clearly, that’s asking for too much in the given circumstance.
No comments:
Post a Comment