By Telegraph Nepal
The 22 Party in what had been advertised and organized as
a ‘show of strength’ against Unified Maoists’ Party led coalition government
demanding its resignation proved to be an unproductive exercise as people
showed their least interest in the proven failed political actors.
Back square to one that is from
Ratnapark to Ratnapark, if one were to recall. History repeated itself so fast?
The mass meet was organized at
Tudikhel, Kathmandu, June 8, 2012.
“Perhaps there are more speakers
than listeners”, said a bystander and added, “Show of weakness.”
This spoke symbolically of the
people’s disregard for the parties developed over these NOIDA years.
None of the speakers were clear
with their vision except in that they heavily criticized the Unified Maoists.
“In the absence of monarchy, had
the Unified Maoists party too not existed where would have these vision less
parties pushed the country towards”, comment critics.
President Sushil Koirala of
Nepali Congress who is not even considered a satisfactory speaker was of the
view that the Unified Maoists party was taking on to the course of self
destruction.
Notably, this time around Sushil
did not criticize the institution of monarchy. He nevertheless kept on
referring to the so-called ‘theory of reconciliation’ propounded by
‘Maha-manab’ B.P. Koirala.
Late Koirala must have shed his
precious tears in the heaven (Rest in peace).
Chairman Jhalnath Khanal, of the
Sunsari Regmi’s fame, yet claimed that if PM Baburam does not resign he will be
dragged out of his Baluwatar residence by the public as they did with the
former dictators. He also did not refer to Nepal’s last King Gyanendra Shah.
But which people will come to his
party’s support?
Khanal claimed that the election
was a drama staged by the Unified Maoists’ Party.
In all, the show of strength
turned out to be a real fiasco.
Yet the “energetic” Senior leader
Sher Bahadur Deuba of NC forwarded three alternatives to resolve the present
political stalemate.
“First, CA revival should be
prioritized, second referendum and CA election. The best of three alternatives
is the revival of CA”, Deuba claimed.
Once again abstract proposition.
Deuba claimed that the Maoists’
are actually not in favor of the welfare of the Janajatis and also of other
marginalized communities.
“The Maoists’’ Newa: state in
charge is a Brahmin. The in charge of Limbuwan is a Chhetri. How can the
Maoists be in favor of Janajatis,” questioned Deuba who is otherwise not taken
as a brilliant Nepali leader.
“But, isn’t it a positive
Maoists’ community unity move Mr. Deuba? Think again,” critics suggest.
Senior leader Madhav Kumar Nepal, who
happily receives election defeats, claimed that since the birth of Maoists’
party, the party has caused only pain to the public. “They have looted, killed
and provoking one community against the other”, also claimed Nepal.
But weren’t you election defeated
Mr. Nepal who remained
instrumental in bringing the Maoists from New
Delhi? Albeit you must have been told to do so by some
“aliens” who were very much friendly to late Girija Prasad Koirala then?
Shedding crocodile tears.
K.P. Sharma Oli of United Marxist
Leninist claimed that they have made great efforts to bring the Maoists’ on the
right track but all efforts have gone to the dogs.
By the way, Oli is shortly
landing to Delhi.
Perhaps he will bring in medicines for Nepal ailments.
Former Panchas, Surya Bahadur
Thapa of Rastriya Janshakri Party, Lokendra Bahadur Chand and Pashupati Rana of
Rastriya Prajatantra Party warned towards a possible political accident.
In all, with least participation
of public and unenthusiastic and stale rhetoric lectures of the 22 party
leaders in the mass meet has made it clear the show of strength has turned into
their show of weakness. Thy fate slide now begins. The flop show thus ended.
No comments:
Post a Comment